by stevenaaus » Sat Apr 03, 2010 3:39 am
I saw some Crysis low-setting benches for budget C2D notebooks. Those with a 4500MHD (is this the Mobile Intel 4 series?) GPU only manages 5fps, while the only ATI chip managed 50fps. I found this quote too
In a review published in May 2008, the GMA X4500 showed a superior game performance to the lowest-end 1-year-older GeForce 8400M graphics card, while losing to the still low-end GeForce 8400M GS with a slower CPU.
I have a hunch the 8400M is not even a separate GPU, while the 8400M GS is. Frankly, i'm too over it to research it properly. This industry inspired confusion just p**** me off.