by leileilol » Fri Apr 21, 2006 10:51 am
There are many problems with Ryan FrikaC Smith's excuses. The one that's the most blatant, and the one that I will limit my discussion to, is related to his overt support of radicalism. Note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly educated person who managed to escape Ryan's silly indoctrination and is consequently believable. The problem, as I see it, is not a question of who the popinjays of this society are, but rather that thanks to Ryan, the epidemic of chauvinism is spreading rapidly. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to Ryan. Although this may come as a surprise to some readers, by refusing to act, by refusing to take advantage of a rare opportunity to take the initiative to tell Ryan what we all think of him -- and boy, do I have some choice words I'd like to use -- we are giving Ryan the power to destabilize the already volatile social fabric that he purportedly aims to save.
If some people are offended by my mentioning that in this case, the obvious solution is also the correct one, then so be it. I frequently talk about how Ryan justifies his plans to trick our children into adopting unconventional, disapproved-of opinions and ways of life as "preemptive self-defense". I would drop the subject, except that he wants to prepare the ground for an ever-more vicious and brutal campaign of terror. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. When you get right down to it, his fantasy is to make a big deal out of nothing. He dreams of a world that grants him such a freedom with no strings attached. Welcome to the world of racism! In that nightmare world it has long since been forgotten that if Ryan were as bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that his circulars reek of conformism. I use the word "reek" because I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness he is mongering. We need to provide a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it. Ryan's grand plan is to discredit legitimate voices in the emotionalism debate. I'm sure Mao Tse Tung would approve. In any case, wowserism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's Ryan's favorite; it makes it easy for him to legitimate irresponsibility, laziness, and infidelity. Which brings me to my point. Ryan occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit.
It's possible that Ryan, using every conceivable means for his purpose, is determined to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. However, I cannot speculate about that possibility here because I need to devote more space to a description of how the point at which you discover that I wouldn't put it past Ryan to pursue a wanton, evil agenda under the guise of false concern for the environment, poverty, civil rights, or whatever is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that his gofers have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times -- stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize his gutless wisecracks. It is obviously not a pretty sight. As it turns out, Ryan ignores a breathtaking number of facts, most notably:
Fact: It really bothers Ryan when people don't obey him.
Fact: It would not be out of character for Ryan to engage in the trafficking of human beings.
Fact: His analects celebrate deception, diversion, and fashion.
In addition, "tolerance" means tolerance of all, not only of a select few. (Actually, some time ago, in the aftermath of his last volley of attacks, a group of the most directionless parvenus you'll ever see began to address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem but that's not important now.) I'll give you an example of this, based on my own experience. As you know, he likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of antagonism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, Ryan invariably instructs his foot soldiers to spam the Internet with unsolicited picayunish junk e-mail. Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual, it makes perfect sense in light of Ryan's uneducated manifestos. Not surprisingly, his "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude is sadistic, because it leaves no room for compromise. Let me conclude by saying that we who want to stop this insanity will not rest until we do.