porting super8
Moderator: InsideQC Admins
44 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: porting super8
by leileilol » Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:54 pm
There's a DOS port too if you're interested on putting Super8 on the big 16-bit x86 operating system.
- leileilol
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:23 am
Re: porting super8
by Spirit » Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:31 pm
Are the pak files lowercase too?
Improve Quaddicted, send me a pull request: https://github.com/SpiritQuaddicted/Quaddicted-reviews
- Spirit
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 9:00 pm
Re: porting super8
by leileilol » Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:17 am
- leileilol
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:23 am
Re: porting super8
by qbism » Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:16 am
Last edited by qbism on Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
qbism - Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:51 am
Re: porting super8
by leileilol » Tue Jan 03, 2012 2:17 am
- leileilol
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:23 am
Re: porting super8
by qbism » Tue Jan 03, 2012 3:21 am
pure coincidence, just noticed release today: FreeDOS 1.1 -
qbism - Posts: 1236
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:51 am
Re: porting super8
by leileilol » Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:20 am
In DOSBox I get an insufficient free memory for q_malloc error (with memsize=48)
I also noticed it's not using 48mb, just 32mb
I also noticed it's not using 48mb, just 32mb
- leileilol
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:23 am
Re: porting super8
by mh » Sun Jan 22, 2012 8:21 pm
I'd kill ipx. It was a nice protocol in it's day but not even it's own mother loves it any more.
-
mh - Posts: 2292
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:38 am
44 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests