Best Map Compile Utilities
Moderator: InsideQC Admins
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Best Map Compile Utilities
by Team Xlink » Sun Nov 01, 2009 5:12 pm
Last edited by Team Xlink on Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Team Xlink
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:45 am
- Location: Michigan
by Team Xlink » Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:53 pm
- Team Xlink
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:45 am
- Location: Michigan
by Spirit » Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:59 am
Improve Quaddicted, send me a pull request: https://github.com/SpiritQuaddicted/Quaddicted-reviews
- Spirit
- Posts: 1037
- Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 9:00 pm
by goldenboy » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:25 pm
In tests, Bengt's vis tool seemed to do the best culling. I would advise to use that.
You can see how much of a map is actually rendered with an engine that lets you lock the PVS, like Tyrquake. It was pretty interesting to do this and compare the rendering of the same map compiled using different vis tools.
That will influence FPS for sure.
I think some engines also promise improved culling, but that's beyond the mapper's control (well, without applying unreasonable methods).
You can see how much of a map is actually rendered with an engine that lets you lock the PVS, like Tyrquake. It was pretty interesting to do this and compare the rendering of the same map compiled using different vis tools.
That will influence FPS for sure.
I think some engines also promise improved culling, but that's beyond the mapper's control (well, without applying unreasonable methods).
-
goldenboy - Posts: 924
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:04 pm
- Location: Kiel
by Team Xlink » Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:58 pm
- Team Xlink
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:45 am
- Location: Michigan
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest