|
Cheating..-
HME [4:21pm - 12/27/98] |
To: [email protected] Subject:
Recent Developments In The Cheating Escapade [Editorial]
Hello. I am using a fake email and an alias to send this
message. My reason? Because if I used my real nick/email
I would be accused of cheating on every server I went
to and probably shunned from the tf community. The anti-cheat
activists who will be spoken of include The Hal (of planetfortress.com),
Scatterblak (of scatterblak.com), DevilM (member of clan
defiance), Sgt.Coolguy (of planetfortress.com), and other
members of the tf community (specifically of clan d3f
and clan AM). This message is being sent to various tf
news sites, editorial sites, and those whom I am speaking
of. Do not expect anyone to read the replies sent back
to this email address as it will be canceled once this
message is sent. With that said the following is my take
on the events that have taken place during the past few
days. I believe it all started with a post on planetfortress.coms
main page by The Hal. After stating some names of people
who run cheat sites he wrote, I don't have the knowledge
to get after these guys and exterminate their vile existence
from our community, but I have informed those who do have
the talent and knowledge. This post was quickly followed
up by one on scatterblak.com encouraging people to spam
the message board of a known tf cheats site. Though quite
a few people (in d3f mainly) participated in this, the
main culprit was DevilM. A program was set up which posted
a message with random topics a few times every minute.
Scatterblak wrote this on his page after the bombs, I'd
like to thank everyone who participated in bombing the
TFCheats Message Board. Though the site is still up, the
message board has now been password protected. I hope
some of you ingenious people can either crack the password,
or email the pussy, er, um, sysadmin and get access.
He also then suggests hacking into the site to shut it
down. The next day on his site was another post from him
with the following content, "...Thx to Srg CoolGuy for
suggesting a way to circumvent security on certain sites
on the internet. For instance, some sites might be retarded
enough to allow you to ftp in anonymously. If you run
across one of these sites, theoretically you could get
in by trying the following: FTP to the site (cheat.site.written.here.com,
for example). He then gave instructions on how to hack
the site. Despite a some fancy wording this is obviously
a clear message with detailed instructions to the tf community
that the site should be hacked. The site was hacked repeated
times by numerous people and scatterblak and several others
claimed victory. Several hours later the cheating site
was back up with everything back to normal. These actions
by respected members of the tf community are absolutely
appalling. Not only are they hypocritical in their message
but they promote illegal activities in the process. So
you want to end cheating in quake? Fine, thats your prerogative.
But telling people to go out and engage themselves in
illegal activities is not the way to do it. Hacking is
illegal. Spamming messages boards is considered denial
of service which is also illegal. Granted, scatterblak
did most of the encouragement but planetfortress was just
as bad with its direction to blaks site and one of its
writers coming up with hack itself. The Hal and others
contest that cheating is wrong. It is bad, unethical,
and it must be stopped. But is hacking cheating sites
really the way to do it? Are malicious and illegal actions
not bad, if not much worse, as well? The old adage goes,
eye for an eye and well all be blind. Perhaps certain
people need to take heed to this. Now that I have gotten
that issue off my chest, I would like to talk about cheating
itself. Steadfast anti-cheaters such as The Hal, Scatterblak,
and Cheat_H8r (appropriate nick) have long stated that
cheating ruins games such as quake, giving players unfair
advantages. Well Ive got news for you the world aint
fair. Never has been, never will be. Is someone with a
30 ping compared to someone with a 280 ping not unfair
as well? The only difference between someone using a hacked
map and someone who has a low ping is the fact that being
a lpb costs them money. You dont hear people like The
Hal making posts about lpbs who should have their isps
remove their account because they have low pings. Yet
they still have an advantage; one much greater than having
transparent walls. Shouldnt those who have fast computers
be shunned and hacked as well? They have an advantage
dont they? Granted there are certain malicious cheats
(such as the pak eraser, which btw was not released by
qwhaxor for that very reason) but again how much more
malicious is that compared to encouraging people to hack
a website? Games will never be fair. There will always
be cheaters, there will always be those with better and
faster computers. Denial of service and hacking are not
actions that responsible people would encourage or pursue.
But lets take the hypothetical situation that all tf cheating
sites have been eliminated. By whatever means, people
such as The Hal, DevilM, and Scatterblak have succeeded.
What happens now? Those who made the cheats and distributed
them continue to make them but are no longer able to make
them widely available. So instead of many people having
and knowing about them, only a few select individuals,
who are close to those that find/make them, know about
them. What you end up with are small groups of people
who posses incredibly powerful cheats and no one knows
that they have them. You see, when tf cheats sites distribute
cheats, sooner or later they end up being fixed. Remember
that invisible medic cheat? The conc cure? If sites such
as the one that got hacked had not distributed this information
they would have never been fixed. Why do you think *nix
operating systems are so much more secure than windows?
Because thousands of people everyday look for bugs in
the operating systems and distribute them through means
such as bugtraq. The point is, these sites are not as
detrimental as many believe them to be. Then again, people
such as The Hal are not morons. Remember that no one is
going to read a site if there is no controversy involved
(a la media in the OJ Simpson case). Everything is fine
is not a very news-worthy story. Now Im not saying this
is the case with in this situation, but it is always a
possibility. In closing I would like to echo my disgust
with the recent actions that have taken place. Those who
instigated these actions are no better, and in my opinion
much worse, than the cheaters themselves. Also keep in
mind that those who are the most cynical towards cheaters
are often the ones who cheat themselves (just like homophobics).
Those in glass houses are in no position to throw stones.
Signed, no-one.
|
To: [email protected]
Subject: Well damnit ill mail you and give you my two
cents You know pisses me off...everyone thinks pyro is
nothing but a spaming class...Why do us pyros get discriminated
agianst, just because we have the ability to spam(napalm
grens) doesnt mean that we spam all the time. Many other
classes have this same ability; soldiers with nail grens,
and how many times have you seen a demo piping the respawn?
But no, people always critize the pyro as a skilless clan
that only spams. Why is it my class gets the brunt end
of the stick....well damnit i wont have it...its time
for all us pyros to stand up for our rights and rise up
agianst there oppressors. As much as people may think..a
good pyro has to have skill, because a good pyro generally
doesnt use his/her napalms to excess..sure youll spam
a sentry but who wouldnt. But when i comes down to it
pyros dont use there napalm grens to kill but their enemys
but their rockets or regular grens. Gopher_Gawds ramblings....um
a no.. i mean Two Cents
|
Words of Wisdom-
HME [9:34pm - 10/13/98] |
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Suggestions
Get Laughing Boy (aka Mwhahaha :) to put up an artwork page..
those images you do are great! They should be put on a seperate
page in addition to the news so as to reflect on their greatness
:)
- >V<SailorScout
|
[Tr!cky]-
HME [3:28pm - 10/12/98] |
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [Tr!cky]
I've run into that asshole too, a few times. Kept killing people
by spamming napalms, and then would boast "now what's my
name?" Eventually I typed "llama". Then he proceeded
to call me a llama for being an LPB sniper, saying that LPB means
you need no skill to kill everyone coming across the bridge...
...now I realize that low ping helps, but dammit, it doesn't
mean you are god. I do a decent job and get kills as sniper,
but I miss a lot, too. And I've been in some challenging sniper
wars with HPB snipers... ...Interesting, too, that this [Tr!cky]
doesn't snipe or play soldier, but yet seems to know so much
about those classes...
- [DD]Firestorm
|
Inferno Tournaments Spam Rule- HME [3:55pm - 10/8/98] |
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: The spam rule
Well, the definition of spam I'm thinking of would be more along
the lines of text, since many times, grenade spamming is fought
back as being a form of defense. So, text spamming (like quotes
or the macros in MM1) are spam. Also any excessive unessecary
grenade spam (ie 4 napalms, 15+ caltrops) would be spam. The
only way to get caught with that, though, would be through a
picture, so most of the time they would get away with it. Oh
well, maybe the rule will deter them from even trying.
- Xtreme
|
>V< Some0ne's inflatable
sheep!- MwhahahA [9:27pm - 9/28/98] |
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Someone's Stance on inflatable sheep
Where did you find that advertizement? It was going to be on
the back of Chex cereal - unfortunately the CEO of the company
didn't like the idea, he said it was unsuitable not only for
children, but everyone.
What kind of crap is that? Am I wrong to think that everyone
needs sheep lovin? Everyone needs it, it calls us from generations
ago, but with all these cities who can afford to keep a couple
sheep? How many shepherds do you know? How many of these shepherds
pimp their sheep anymore?
None, absolutely none.
I'm doing a favor to mankind and you should never buy Chex because
they're stuckup doofs!
- >V< Someone
|
I think I was threatened by >V<
Some0ne or his mother...- MwhahahA [7:10am - 9/9/98] |
i udn about you utt i dont put wiup wh GAY
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dont ene theink that ou ccan say ti stuff if the lad cas my mom
WILL GET MADA!!!!
p.s. yrou are gay!!!!!!~~~~!~!@!@@!
- >V< Someone
I ph33r his mom...well not really ;P
PS: this was a joke but an actuall email
;P
|
|