Darkplaces and Nehglquake

[yhe1]

For Darkplaces, I have the following settings in my autoexec.cfg

cl_particles_blood_alpha "1"
cl_stainmaps "0"
cl_stainmaps_clearonload "0"
gl_polyblend "0.200000"
r_coronas "0"
r_glsl "0"
r_shadow_gloss "0"
r_shadow_realtime_dlight "0"
r_shadow_realtime_dlight_shadows "0"
r_shadow_realtime_world_dlightshadows "0"
r_shadow_realtime_world_shadows "0"

Can somebody tell me how to recreate the following settings in nehglquake?

I had always thought that Darkplaces was more demanding on the system than nehGlquake. But for some maps, Darkplaces fun fine with Dynamic lights on, but Nehglquake has low framerate. Thanks.

[Baker]

My guess in what would work fastest with Nehglquake. I would do this in steps:

gl_flashblend 1 (gl_flashblend 0 tends to be slow with old computers)
r_shadows 0 (if needed, doesn't render shadows)
Maybe play with r_dyamic but I can't imagine it being helpful
gl_polyblend 0 (I don't recommend this really, but if you need it ...)

And really that should be it.

Nehglquake doesn't have a ton of fancy lighting options and so forth and is similar to Enhanced GLQuake (same author).

BUT:

Before you do ANY of that ...

Try starting Nehglquake with -gamma 0.65 in the command line. 0.65 isn't a magic number but using this should disable hardware gamma in NehGlQuake and with how sucky the Intel cards are, I bet this is very helpful. It will use Quake's palette'd approach to render graphics which by all accounts can be a lot faster.

[yhe1]

Thanks turns out all I needed was gl_flashbend 1 and r_shadow 0 and it runs fine.