Put cheatfree on dm.quaketx

[Authentic]

eh? 2 years ago??? eh?? I've been playing since like 97-98.. rofl

Im patbot/threshertu

[Shadowswift]

*dies*

[oldendirt]

kimp isn't the only one with a cheat client. I have them. Every single person who plays has them.

please...don't lump me in with you.

amen.

[oldendirt]

...for you to try to call me out on here for being an ass, when everyone already knows i'm an ass, is asinine and dumb.

win

[oldendirt]

This isn't a popularity contest, but if it were, you'd be fn dead last. Cuz your a prick.

[oldendirt]

Most likely, but I'm not a small enough man to scratch and claw for anything I can to make myself look like I'm more than I am by coming up with excuses or pointing out the one time I did win. There's a lot of players out there that could wipe the floor with me on any map, but I don't give a shit, and not because you're trash. Problem?

Foq, you amaze me with your aim.

[bluntz]

Sound tells me everything. Ask Quaker Oats, the other day he made the "oof" going down steps/dropping noise, going from Red Armor to Red Armor Tunnel leading to Mound, and I was waiting on him ,as soon as he made the noise, I was like BZZZZZZZT down the tunnel hole,and had him trapped !

He suicided :F

I got him good in CAX the other day using my ghost pine.
He was camping YA so I spammed rox into it from Pent window backing him into the hole then at the same time tossed some pines at it waited for the bang and rocket bunnied at the next bang I rocket bunnied again around the promenade to YA where I found him still backed into the hole.
Banked a pine off far wall to a nice Splat,.As I giggled above him.
Never trust your ears brah

[bluntz]

Back to the subject
Tremor has what he needs and all objectives in this thread have been accomplished.
There is no excuse not to have cheatfree in place now.
Even if you can not fix the If statement Rook gave out.
All you need to do is grab his copy.

Time to lock

[lust]

really i dont think anyone cheats anymore lol. i been playing this game for a while, and played against ppl who have cheated, and the top players who were suspected cheaters years after, especialy in ca. once you actualy played agaisnt someone with aimbot or pak2. its pretty obv. and i dobt ppl have hacks and milk it all game all day so its hard to be detected. lol i think the majority is the fact we all played the same map like 100,000,000 times and shit becomes either instinct, random or timing and obv factors. plus its not hard to use sound in this game, when someone dies you can hear them spawn and if you care enough can listen to the shit and practiacly pin point where they are heading. to wrap this up. ive yet to see anything funny or fishy in like the last 5-6 years in ca/dm lol. if you work hard enough anyones style of playing can be overcome or matched. you jsut have to be perfect with rl shots

now close the thread and shut it down.

thats a wrap up

[bluntz]

It does not matter whether it is needed or not to thwart cheaters.
The Cheatfree patch affords much better bandwidth to the server regardless.
So it is a win win situation without any downside.

[lust]

i beg the differ, its about server location for pings, im not saying dont set them all up. ofcourse it would be "better" and make everyone feel more secure in the b.s ways. but what was i saying.. yeah it depends on server locations for pings not cheatfree, i should no since chi located servers are the only servers i dont have 100 ping at regardless of set ups. and low ping is for noobs

wrap it up

[foq]

i beg the differ, its about server location for pings, im not saying dont set them all up. ofcourse it would be "better" and make everyone feel more secure in the b.s ways. but what was i saying.. yeah it depends on server locations for pings not cheatfree, i should no since chi located servers are the only servers i dont have 100 ping at regardless of set ups. and low ping is for noobs

wrap it up

The antiwallhack cvar reduces the amount of bandwidth the server uses. He's not saying it would improve ping, but that it would reduces the amount of bandwidth the server would use.

[lust]

wrap it up

[bluntz]

i beg the differ, its about server location for pings, im not saying dont set them all up. ofcourse it would be "better" and make everyone feel more secure in the b.s ways. but what was i saying.. yeah it depends on server locations for pings not cheatfree, i should no since chi located servers are the only servers i dont have 100 ping at regardless of set ups. and low ping is for noobs

wrap it up

ping is the time it takes to send 1 packet to and then return back.
Bandwidth is the amount of packets that can be sent.
So the difference for the user will be less packet loss.
There may be even more substantial benefits server side as the cpu may in fact have fewer calcs to do.
In ANY case there is no downside only improved response and possibly lower cost to run the server.

[Tremor]

Yes well. dm.quaketx.com is now running R00k's pent/quad glow fix + sv_cullentities 2 (Anti-wallhack). We now have the best of both worlds. There is no reason that anyone should suspect wallhackers on my server. Both ports 26000/01 have the newly compiled binary. All that is left is for Baker to add the Anti-wallhack image in front of the server name on the server list.