Bad Protocol

[monoz]

<------ lazaris tusa.

Kimp can suck it.

[Mindf!3ldzX]

mono>any game involving kimp.

gj mono,heres your beer brah

[Souless]

Why make it 2vs2vs2? it was 2vs2 then it got forced. I told you and mark to cc in to make 3, added u both, YOU immedately dc'd after i put you in. And you went blue to make it 2vs2vs1 (someone from yellow left). So with you leaving, It was 2vs1vs1. GG.

Then the server emptied out because of over modding.

[Mindf!3ldzX]

I wonder how there can be over modding going on. I love details, humor me. Last time them kind of statements was made, it was bad stuff in the end.

[Souless]

If players want to play 2vs2vs2 they should be able to play 2vs2vs2. We were all in ready to go and the mod removed 2 from one of the teams. This caused the game not to start right away and because of it everyone left. If 2vs2vs2's are bad then why even have the option of 4 teams?

[Magnus]

12 teams please

[Baker]

This thread is why democracy doesn't actually work in practice. This isn't something I recently figured out, I saw this back in 2006 when people were more than willing to participate in CA tournaments filled with wallhackers.

Don't worry, you'll like what you end up getting in the end. But I'll feel slightly dirty knowing I am really a tyrant king.

I comfort this guilt knowing I am a benign one who cares about the game and act solely in the interest of players.

But just a warning: I need Kimp until I complete this. Read into this what you will. I am very deliberate and only act when it fulfills *my* own goals. At first this might disturb you, but in the end my goals are for you to have an assured quality game. It is just I don't trust others to have faith in my methods, schedule or motives.

[Phenom]

This thread is why democracy doesn't actually work in practice. This isn't something I recently figured out, I saw this back in 2006 when people were more than willing to participate in CA tournaments filled with wallhackers.

Don't worry, you'll like what you end up getting in the end. But I'll feel slightly dirty knowing I am really a tyrant king.

I comfort this guilt knowing I am a benign one who cares about the game and act solely in the interest of players.

But just a warning: I need Kimp until I complete this. Read into this what you will. I am very deliberate and only act when it fulfills *my* own goals. At first this might disturb you, but in the end my goals are for you to have an assured quality game. It is just I don't trust others to have faith in my methods, schedule or motives.

CoD Black Ops:
Baker = Mason
Kimp = Reznov

Don't spoil it

[Baker]

CoD Black Ops:
Baker = Mason
Kimp = Reznov

Don't spoil it

I never claimed to be a saint. I am clearly not evil. It doesn't make my methods good. In some ways, everyone is going to get to see the shame of my methods --- if you aren't a little shocked now, you will be. And I offer apologies to none. It's not because I don't care, it is precisely because I do care. I intend to exploit current circumstances to benefit the community --- not everyone will appreciate my plans immediately.

More I will not say except to the extent that I view the results as everything. Some people are going to end up pissed off with me in the short term and *frankly* a little revolted.

I'm no coward and am taking the opportunity *now* to explain I want the Quake community to get everything it wants. Some of you won't understand how I view timing, development and coordination as everything. And we deserve it all. In Half-Life there is a map called "Questionable Ethics" --- this is going to happen first hand in this community and it isn't quite as clean I would prefer. I am saying this in advance. Sometimes you have to make hard decisions, I accept this. Some of the decisions are a bit stomach-churning. Eventually, you'll see what I mean ... but not today -- and almost no one in reality will care as the results impact only one troublesome player. But on my time-table and you'll see why ... but it won't detract from the obvious that I am using a situation in part to further secondary objectives to advance the community.

[Grim Warlock]

Wow, what is this shit? KimpOne.com? Just fucking ban the asshole forever and do it by IP from every server that exists. These Kimp threads are starting to piss me off.

[Phenom]

Wow, what is this shit? KimpOne.com? Just fucking ban the asshole forever and do it by IP from every server that exists. These Kimp threads are starting to piss me off.

_____

Baker = Donald Sutherland
Christopher Murphy = whiny chick

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWr80meNvSQ[/ame]

[StatiC]

I've been letting Kimp play because it was Christmas

uhh yea, kimps jewish..... kimp'D ?

[Baker]

Wow, what is this shit? KimpOne.com? Just fucking ban the asshole forever and do it by IP from every server that exists. These Kimp threads are starting to piss me off.

Exactly.

The whole problem is that from time to time you have someone who behaves in a manner that is an incredible liability to the community.

And the way things work out is that these problem players are allowed to linger around so they never leave.

Anyway, a fun problem to work through that needs and will get a solution. It just sucks that right now I don't have as much time to complete some my projects as I was hoping that assist in solving these kinds of problems.

But I can imagine that once this stuff does get implemented, the online portion of the community will be able to grow better. This current problem player isn't the only problem player, back a few years ago when the online portion of the community surged there were maybe 10 problem players.

And to some extent, the inability to effectively manage server administration easily is a deterrent to growing the community. Because you end up with more problem players when size increases, ultimately sabotaging the actual growth.

However annoying this is at this point in time, there will come the day when this type of problem is solved by universal administration controls. The specifics will sort themselves out when the time is right.

[foq]

If players want to play 2vs2vs2 they should be able to play 2vs2vs2. We were all in ready to go and the mod removed 2 from one of the teams. This caused the game not to start right away and because of it everyone left. If 2vs2vs2's are bad then why even have the option of 4 teams?

Someone get this man a beer.

[Authentic]

Server emptied out because "zord/kimp" decided to go AFK in the middle of the match. GG. He then went to Rage.quakeone.com and loaded up his bot and ruined games there.