Should JohnRocker be perma banned from Rage?

[Canadian*Sniper]

This thread sounds like rook should implement a perma mute function If someone running his/her mouth is a problem and you have a mute function, banning is the choice of action?

[Stung]

Yeah phenom, he's your run of the mill obvious/overt dick who tries to get under other peoples skin to feel relevant. That is all. What he said isnt about you, but a reflection on him.

The question isn't about the irrelevant bullshit these idiots keep proposing: it's not about if he's a good quake player. it isnt about potential admin abuse . it isn't even about the fact that he mouthed off. it's the degree of which he does it that matters, and the fact that he lied about it.

[Phenom]

A mute function that can be set to , minutes, hours, days, years! and when you connect it taunts you.

"You are still muted. Time remaining until your mute is lifted... ALONG ASS TIME!"

[Souless]

This is shitty.. He really needs to be unbanned... He's one of 3 guys in Bizarro who is active and plays often... I've known him for like 8 years and he's always been really annoying.... Unban him.. If he acts up one more time and doesn't shut his mouth then I won't defend him anymore and he can eat shit... Oh and BTW.. I don't read any of your posts Plest because I can't be looking at titties while im in the main office of my job.. Change that shit...

[BizarroMonkey]

I agree with Souless, change your picture if you want me to look at forums during work .

[JohnRocker]

phenom.. i dont shit talk vis on rage. hell yes i do on irc but thats because its deserved. and why would i apoligize to vis? what have i done wrong? nothing. i told him i would behave and i did. i have nothing to apoligize for. and it was funny he msg'd me and said "Speedy gonzales" said i've been shit talking lately.. speedy is crissy aka BONBONS or Frozen Fingers for people who dont know.. fine me and crissy has never got along, but i havent even seen her play in a few weeks.. and he said kp-swiss said i was shit talking lately. which is totally untrue.. i asked swiss about this and he said i've been behaved lately, i only talked shit when he first started quaking again.. back in december or so.. so clearly vis was just looking for reasons to ban. i dont really care that im banned, i'll just avoid the ban and play under a name no one knows thanks to neil for the help .

[Net-Tyme]

I agree.. that pic isn't appropiate for work. That's all they need to hit your machine to get rid of you. Talked to a lady today that works at a hospital who was terminated for excessive emails. Mind you the other lady and her were both terminated for the same thing. Give them a reason they can use it.

[BizarroMonkey]

haha, this quake drama is like something off of a soap opera or out of a tweenager's slumber party. "wah wah so and so told so and so that i was talking shit to so and so!!! i'm so and so's bitch!!! wahhhh." did you see that? i laugh at your many misfortunes!

[BizarroMonkey]

Oh and I looked at that shit a few times at work on accident, I hope I don't get in trouble over it . But, then again lots of people in my department look at stuff they aren't supposed to.

[spooker]

haha stung is a virgin

[Stung]

haha stung is a virgin

Been fuckin bitches since '99. False.

[spooker]

dont you mean fallacio ad hominim absurdum ex gloria in excelsis deo?

[Spazm]

Point taken.

With that in mind, I am not trying to disprove what I've already disproved (or prove what I've already proved for that matter). That is indeed a redundant activity. I'm basically letting him form an argument, and identifying logical fallacies as I see them; call it keeping your skills fresh, if you will. Practice is naturally redundant, and improves skill, and is not illogical if maintaining or improving skill is indeed the end game.

Practicing? Bullshit. False. I don't believe that was your intention at all. That's all I will say to you, because there is no sense arguing with someone who is so stubborn in his logic, that he will come up with anything to further bullshit his logical position.

[Stung]

Practicing? Bullshit. False. I don't believe that was your intention at all. That's all I will say to you, because there is no sense arguing with someone who is so stubborn in his logic, that he will come up with anything to further bullshit his logical position.

You aren't a qualified authority on evaluating the veracity of my statements about my intent. I am. Therefore your evaluation is persuasively irrational and irrelevent. Not to mention the abusive/circumstantial conclusion, forgot about that. Anything else?

It's amazing how you idiots make it seem as if I can subjectively manipulate logic. Logic is pretty black and white. What I said was true and factual; I proved my prior argument to be soundly valid, and I've been identifying the logical flaws in his counterarguments. You seriously should think about educating yourselves before challenging me in any manner on the issue before doing so. Oh, and practicing helps as well. Imagine that.

[Spazm]

"You aren't a qualified authority on evaluating the veracity of my statements. I am. Therefore your evaluation is persuasively irrational and irrelevent. Anything else?"

Again, you have not proven you were practicing your logic skills on John Rocker, which means I still stand by my prior statement about it being illogical for you to argue with the irrational. Heresay cannot be disproven, so nobody is a qualified authority to evaluate whether your statements are true. Your word against mine, if you will. This led to my 'opinionated conclusion' of my last thread, because by you resorting to things that cannot be proven, particularly something that seemed so ridiculous (I am practicing so I improve at logic), I formed an opinion that you were making it up.

Logic is not always black and white. Sure, something is either right or wrong, and if this was math, that would indeed be the case. But your case against me is built on your own opinion, and opinion is subjected to many different views of what is right. Some things you say to others are based on facts, which is logical, and some things you say (like the practicing example) cannot be proven because it is your word. In the latter, nobody is qualifed to argue, so by calling me an idiot by questioning 'your word' as a logical argument, you have indeed shown me your ignorance.

And indeed I am now being illogical, because I have continued to argue with your pig-headedness. I guess that makes me pig headed and 'an idiot' too.