Doug caught aimbotting on speaknow. Discuss.

[mithril]

I was only correcting Doug out of facetiousness. Seriously mithril, you didn't catch on to the joke? Christ people are such concrete thinkers in 2008. If IQs have indeed gone up .32 points per year since 1918, I'd hate to have to experience the level of retardation that went on back then. If you can't extrapolate the pragmatic meaning from that sentence, which infers [It is], then I suggest you take a flying fucking leap off a short pier.

And yes I am the grammar king; I believe a 35 on the ACTs in 2000 pretty much speaks for itself.

Lol, don't get mad at the messenger. If you're going to go around pointing out other people's mistakes in an asshole-like way, you should be damn sure you never screw up.

[gulliver-trans]

Infers/Implies.

I have GOT to unsubscribe from this dumpster of a thread. Sheeeeeeesh.

[Stung]

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
in�fer /ɪnˈfɜr/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[in-fur] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation verb, -ferred, -fer�ring.
–verb (used with object) 1. to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence: They inferred his displeasure from his cool tone of voice.
2. (of facts, circumstances, statements, etc.) to indicate or involve as a conclusion; lead to.
3. to guess; speculate; surmise.
4. to hint; imply; suggest.

Sheesh, you people are in dire need of something to do. And yes I will be an asshole to Doug, as it's well-earned mithril. Perhaps you should learn when not to involve yourself in things. I also did not screw up the facetious continuance of foqer and Doug's exchange. I presume you're a republican with that level of overgeneralization pervading your brain, mithril.

[Doug`]

wow, lol

I'm picturing stung sitting at the computer looking through a dictionary and copying definitions to correct a post from a online gaming site....that paints a sad picture

"Duog"

[Canadian*Sniper]

Everything Stung posts is a copy/paste from dictionary.com, philosophy.com, and math.com.

[Stung]

To add to that point, it never ceases to amaze me to what lengths people with personality disorders or disruptive traits will go to involve themselves in problems that are exclusive to others. I've dealt with Doug's idiocy plenty of times, and I've dealt with omi calling me a richmarker before. That in a way makes me an impartial party who should opine to restore a semblance of reality to Doug's blatant toggling. When did this involve you mithril?

[Stung]

To expand your point canadian sniper, everything is plagiarized, on a technical basis, as I do not know who arbitrarily created the words I'm typing, nor have I cited who they are. People develop on an interpersonal basis--we "plagiarize" character traits on a certain osmotic neural level. So yes, this means I'm essentially copying & pasting everything from prior experiences. When one thinks of things on that level, they can actually start to realize the radical Western individualism we espouse, where we're all unique and speshul, is pretty much bunk. We're unique in the degrees of our traits (chemically and genetically determinated) only. To expect me to say anything more than things already said for thousand of years is pretty naive on a fundamental level.

[Doug`]

blah blah blah

You copy from a dictionary to correct people on an online post(period)

enough said.

[Doug`]

Dread

All i know is that, if I was a "boss" which I once was, and i "suspended" someone or "fired" someone, it is almost mandatory that you give someone an explanation why and for how long. To simply "suspend" someone from hearsay is childish. This is just a game and should not be taken as seriously as it is. In "real life", there are murderers out there who serve short sentences and that's the "real world". To act like you are right now, over this little old game is pathetic. I don't know if it's because you are easily influenced by other people or just can't see the stupidity in all this, but you are over reacting. I hope one day you fall off your high chair and come to your senses.

Doug

[foq]

Nobody wants cheaters around. If it was my server and I had a demo of you cheating you would be banned, end of story. If I was in charge of the "system", murderers would be banned from Earth.

[Doug`]

There has never been any cheating going on from this end kiddo. All people say is "you cheat, there's a demo", what the hell is in this demo that shows that I cheat? Explain that. The fact that 90% of my shots didn't hit? The shaft that doesn't lock on? The fact that I sprayed nails in water and hit someone? Seriously, explain what in that demo shows that i cheat. I dont want a stupid reply that doesn't answer this question, dont bother if you lack in reading comprehension. Simply explain. I can't wait to hear what people come up with about this. My bet is that nobody can give an honest fact that supports these alligations and most will write something that is totally off topic because they just don't have the proof.

GL
Doug

[foq]

I didn't watch the demo. I really don't care that much. The general consensus is that the demo showed cheating, so I went with it.

[Canadian*Sniper]

I didn't watch the demo. I really don't care that much. The general consensus is that the demo showed cheating, so I went with it.

I'm going to lose a lot of faith in you all if this is the general mindset of the quake community.

[mithril]

I presume you're a republican with that level of overgeneralization pervading your brain, mithril.

You presume incorrectly

When did this involve you mithril?

I was involved the moment I had to read you bitch about an insignificant grammar error on a public forum. Seriously, why did you waste everyone's time on calling attention to that?

Possibilities:

1) You're very insecure and constantly need to show everyone how much knowledge you have.

2) You hate Doug so much that any time he posts you have to find something wrong with it so you can flame him.

3) You like being part of the "crowd" so you join in with others on Doug-bashing in some lame attempt at internet bullying.

You may need therapy Stung, seriously there is no shame in asking for help. (PS: I in no way am a fan of Doug - I just don't need to point out dumb mistakes in his posts)

[Baker]

If IQs have indeed gone up .32 points per year since 1918, I'd hate to have to experience the level of retardation that went on back then.

Have you ever watched part of an episode of Lassie on whatever that channel that does the old TV shows from the 50's?

It seems to me that 13-year-olds from back in the 40s and 50s had the mind of 7 or 8 year-old kid from today and if some of them were brought to the future via a time machine, they'd probably be riding the small school bus going to the "special school".

I'm not faulting the people from back then (they couldn't help it, they were a product of their times/environment), but the information age has really had an effect on intelligence in the modern era as far as I can tell.

Prevailing theory cites improvement in nutrition and better health care and education, and no doubt these are major factors.

Also as the number of children per household has declined, the quality of parental attention each child receives is higher. A quality over quantity thing.

/Yeah, off topic from the thread